| |
| |

The inset above shows a sample of extruded pellets that have
suffered attrition damage during vacuum transfer from ground
level into the bed. Whilst the fines produced as a result of
attrition retain the same catalytic properties as the undamaged
pellets, the fines are virtually useless within the bed because
they put up a block against product flow. It is for this reason
up until the development of Dialog Technivac’s ‘Clamflo’
system vacuum loading and unloading of beds regardless of the
inherent advantages has not been the preferred handling method.

Originally invented by Dialog Technivac in 1987 the ‘Clamflo’
ultra low attrition hopper became the first vacuuming separator
to reduce attrition to virtually zero. Whilst there have been
a number of attempts to copy its capabilities it still remains
the most efficient in the service industry. |
|
|
The non prevention of catalyst pellet attrition
during the loading and unloading of beds is a significant cost factor
which often is overlooked and once discovered it can already be too
late. Pellet attrition causes two problems :-
- Any attrition during loading will increase the pressure drop
across the bed, decrease the bed’s efficiency, shorten the life
of the bed and increase plant operating costs.
- Any attrition during the unloading of re-usable catalyst will
directly reduce the amount of recoverable material, increase recovery
costs and necessitate the purchase of top up material.
|
In the first instance although pellet attrition
during bed loading will have a direct effect on plant operating costs
estimating what that increased cost is might not be that easy. However
the cost of attrition as far as the catalyst itself is concerned is
a relatively simple matter.
In basic terms if attrition is zero the full value of the catalyst
is retained and if for example attrition reaches 50% then half of
what was actually paid for the catalyst is completely lost. In the
example shown on the opposite page 10% attrition would equate to £5
thousand and 50% would equate to £25 thousand pounds. In financial
terms therefore the real cost of carrying out any changeout is :-
|
 |
| If this simple formula is applied to any changeout
it is easy to see that if attrition is not controlled the actual value
of destroyed catalyst could easily be in excess of the changeout service
charges. |
| Completely eliminating attrition regardless of
whatever handling method is used in reality is an impossibility. Nevertheless
Dialog Technivac’s ‘Clamflo’ system with a proven
performance of < 0.1% is very close to the mark and in perspective
as the example shows out of a total of 50 x
200 hundred litre drums Dialog Technivac attrition is a mere bucket
full. |
| CLICK HERE FOR AN EXAMPLE |
| |
|